France: scrappage scheme 2.0?
With a unanimous vote, the reuse of cars originally destined for scrapping was decided in favour of the country's most vulnerable citizens. While the intention behind this measure is respectable, its implementation leaves many questions unanswered and raises serious concerns about its environmental impact.
Every year, thousands of vehicles are scrapped in France, many of which have a low environmental impact and low mileage, even though they could still be used. These vehicles are often donated to so-called solidarity garages, which guarantee mobility for people who would otherwise not be able to afford a car. The new legislation now makes it possible to reuse these vehicles and rent them out at a lower cost to the most disadvantaged citizens.
Parliament justified its decision by stating that this was in the public interest. This applies in particular to rural and remote areas. But what about the environmental impact? Although these vehicles are categorised as "low-emission", they are far from being environmentally friendly. Putting these vehicles back on the road could increase air pollution, especially in urban areas where air quality is already problematic.
How does this measure fit in with the existing low emission zones where only low-emission vehicles are allowed? Will there be exemptions for these reused vehicles? If so, does this not undermine the concept of low emission zones and reduce their effectiveness?
Another point of concern is the exchange premium. This enables private individuals to receive a subsidy for the purchase of a low-emission vehicle if they scrap an old vehicle, subject to certain income requirements. By returning vehicles destined for scrapping to the road, the supply of low-emission vehicles in solidarity garages could be reduced.
The intention behind this legislation is laudable as it seeks to ensure mobility for those who need it most. However, its implementation raises significant concerns about its environmental impact and the effectiveness of existing environmental measures. It would be desirable for the Parliament to take these concerns into greater consideration in the future and find solutions that are both socially and environmentally sustainable.